Arizona State Parks Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201196825
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Tempe, AZ, USA
Phone
6028094214
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$2,396
Assets
$8,821
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Neal Brown (President and Director)
  • Becky Hays-Rovey (Vice President and Director)

People named in this filing

  • Neal Brown (President and Director)
  • Becky Hays-Rovey (Vice President and Director)
  • W Gary Hull (Treasurer, Secretary and Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Arizona State Parks Foundation (ASPF) is a statewide 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that has been dedicated to protecting, enhancing and advocating for Arizona's State Parks and Trails. Over the years ASPF has been committed to ensuring State Park and Trail users affordable access to the finest possible experience while visiting Arizona's natural, cultural and recreational resources. ASPF assisted State Parks and Trails in fulfilling its mission through education, community participation and financial support. However, ASPF is in the process of winding up its affairs and will be fully dissolved in the next tax year.

What it reported doing in 2024

ASPF is winding down its affairs and made no contributions to or for the benefit of State Parks this year. ASPF will make final distributions next tax year, at which time it will be dissolved.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.68; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -26.7% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -18.2% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.