Arizona Society of Anesthesiologists

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860193130
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6024891564
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$307,600
Expenses
$423,332
Assets
$654,909
Liabilities
$48,112

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GARY TZENG MD (PRESIDENT)
  • YINGZHONG TIAN MD (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • JOHN MARVEL MD (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • STEVE LINDAUER MD (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • KASSIE MUELLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • GARY TZENG MD (PRESIDENT)
  • YINGZHONG TIAN MD (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • JOHN MARVEL MD (VICE-PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To raise the quality of the practice of anesthesiology, to improve patient care and safety through education, research and advocacy, and to disseminate current information about scientific progress in anesthesiology.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, the Arizona society of anesthesiologists azsa celebrated its 50th annual meeting on january 19-20 at the gila river resorts andcasinos--wild horse pass in chandler, Arizona. The event featured esteemed guest faculty, including dr. Brenda a. Gentz, associate professor of clinical anesthesiology at the university of Arizona college of medicine. Throughout the year, azsa continued its commitment to educational excellence by providing a platform for the exchange of scientific and clinical knowledge among anesthesiologists statewide. The society also maintained its active role in legislative advocacy, working to protect patient safety and uphold high standards in anesthesiology practice. Additionally, azsa collaborated with the Arizona medical association to successfully remove dangerous scope of practice expansion language from sb1334, the aprn state compact bill, ensuring that anesthesia care remains under the supervision of qualified physicians. They also decided to plan regional meetings instead of 1 large conference to get to members in other areas of Arizona.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -37.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.55; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.