Arizona Pharmacy Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860679270
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Tempe, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 4808383385
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $37,963
- Expenses
- $66,026
- Assets
- $139,607
- Liabilities
- $33,477
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Russ Newman (President)
People named in this filing
- Russ Newman (President)
- John Kohli (Director)
- Sherri Oxford (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1. Provide Funds, materials, and resources to educate the public regarding the role of the pharmacist on the health care team, including the proper use of prescription medications and the use of those medications to improve patient care.2. Provide funds, materials and resources to the pharmacy profession in order to further pharmacy research, pharmacy residency programs, student scholarships and leadership development.3. Provide necessary support to assist any health care professional, professional student or licensed support staff with alcohol and/or chemical dependency.
What it reported doing in 2023
Pharmacists Assisting Pharmacists (PAPA).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.1%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 48.9%; rating input score 49
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -73.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.11; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -17.6% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.1% of revenue deployed · 48.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $32K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.