Arizona Literacy and Learning Centerinc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 861032912
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6022121089
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitative Medical Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $818,888
- Expenses
- $715,463
- Assets
- $732,449
- Liabilities
- $30,106
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT RIMER (PRESIDENT)
- JANE BARTELME (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- SUZANNE BRIMLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SUZANNE BRIMLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $52,585 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization improves literacy in Arizona through comprehensive, research-based screenings, diagnosis and treatment for individuals with language-based learning disorders and auditory processing disorders. We provide training to professionals, and promote family and community literacy.
What it reported doing in 2013
Youth and adult services: it is when children enter school that difficulties learning the foundational skills for reading are often identified. In the case of children with language-based learning differences, these skills must be explicitly taught in a manner that is not available in the typical classroom. The center's trained and credentialed professional team provides comprehensive assessment for children with learning disabilities such as dyslexia and auditory processing disorders. By identifying learning difficulties and strengths it is possible to customize an effective intervention program which allows the child to break the reading code and reach their potential. The center offers academic intervention services given by well trained, certified teachers to help children learn to read. Our professionals offer community awareness trainings to parenting groups, and train teachers on recognizing and working with children with dyslexia and auditory processing disorders. We also offer free screenings at phoenix public libraries to find children with signs of reading and writing difficulties. By making changes in the school experience one can truly change a life.as students with learning difficulties reach middle school and high school levels, their strategies for succeeding in school may begin to fail. Simple accommodations to enable access to the school curriculum can make all the difference. By providing evaluations to this population and identifying strengths and needs (such as additional time, oral responses on tests, written material available on recordings), these students can continue to succeed in school, college and life. The center provides such evaluations and recommends accommodations to ensure this success.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.6%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.6%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.3%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.6% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $559K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $53K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.