Arizona Hygiene for Hope
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464998097
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, US
- Phone
- (602) 123-4567
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $66,104,716
- Expenses
- $65,622,560
- Assets
- $1,843,181
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOUG HEMP (VICE PRESIDENT/ SECRETARY)
- HEIDI L HEMP (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- HEIDI L HEMP (PRESIDENT): $20,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Arizona Hygiene for Hope is committed to honoring & empowering underserved individuals, veterans and families and children in our community by proving basic life essentials and motivating them through educational events to prosper and become their personal best.
What it reported doing in 2024
Egg-tra ordinary family is the opportunity to make memories. Everyone knows how stressful the holidays can be, and if you're homeless, in a treatment or rehabilitation center, or maybe you've fostered out of the system, are a senior living alone, a teenager just trying to survive the streets, or a family living below the poverty level, we are here to help.sometimes, just a little candy can bring a well needed smile to someone's face. This last year, we put together and delivered 10,500 easter bags and easter baskets to people who would have been all alone this holiday season.we also handed out hygiene, clothing items, and other basic necessities to give hope.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 99.7%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: $1,043.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 37.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 37.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 29% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 99% of revenue deployed · 99.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 8 filed program accomplishments · $65.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $20K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.