Arizona Education Association Retired
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860605428
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6025741473
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,404
- Expenses
- $96,370
- Assets
- $95,202
- Liabilities
- $18,638
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANNA CICERO (President)
People named in this filing
- ANNA CICERO (President)
- MARIA LEYVA (Secretary)
- STEVE LINDER (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To work for the benefit of retired members in order to: A. Improve their economic benefits including working for and maintaining a permanent cost of living allowance B. Improve health care programs for retirees C. Monitor legislation regarding retirement issues D. Develop social activities and seminars consistent with retirees interests. To work for the welfare of students, the advancement of education, and the improvement of instructional opportunities for all. To support NEA/AEA educational issues, both professional and economic, for the benefit of active and retired members. To function as a representative body to speak with authority for members. To establish cooperation with the education community, the Arizona Education Association, and its affiliates.
What it reported doing in 2024
Recruit retired educators to join the association in order to protect and improve retirement benefits improve public education through advocacy, mentoring, literacy and achieve legislative and political goals for public schools and education employees.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -36.9%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.99; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 25 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.