Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860593601
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6022792900
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,997,406
- Expenses
- $6,041,874
- Assets
- $3,005,461
- Liabilities
- $1,804,395
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER PANAS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER PANAS (CEO): $137,471 total reported compensation
- JUANA GALENO (CFO): $114,963 total reported compensation
- Danielle Washington-Wright (COO): $90,059 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To end sexual and domestic violence in Arizona.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Arizona Sexual and Domestic Violence Helpline Department provides services to victims and survivors of sexual and domestic violence, friends, family, and other concerned individuals who call, text, or chat the Arizona Sexual and Domestic Violence Helpline Department on behalf of survivors of sexual and domestic violence, professionals who are working with survivors of sexual and domestic violence such as case managers, advocates, attorneys medical personnel, teachers counselors, and law enforcement. Additionally, the Arizona Sexual and Domestic Violence Helpline Department provides information, and referral about sexual and domestic violence, assistance navigating the legal system as well as financial assistance throught the Survivor Emergency Relief Fund. The Domestic Violence and Sexual Violence Response Department provides training on sexual and domestic violence to programs, law enforcement, and the community. Additionally, the Domestic Violence and Sexual Violence Response Department provide technical assistance and systems level work to improve the systemic response to sexual and domestic violence. The Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence Pass-through Funds Department provides administrative support and technical assistance to grant applicants and subrecipients of Pass-through funds. The Pass-through funds subrecipients are nonprofit domestic and/or sexual violence service providers who provide critical services to victims and survivors of sexual and/or domestic violence.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 93% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 52% for direct work, and 48% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.6%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $114.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.6%; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.6; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.6% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $137K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 27 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 24 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.