Arizona Christian Education Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883694611
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Scottsdale, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6027637227
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,500
- Expenses
- $43,258
- Assets
- $60,590
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAN KUIPER (President)
People named in this filing
- DICK BUCKINGHAM (Director)
- DAN KUIPER (President)
- KYLE MAESTRI (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Arizona Christian Education Coalition, an Arizona nonprofit corporation (AzCEC) is a coalition of private Christian schools that exists for the purpose of educating the public, making recommendations to legislative bodies regarding public policy issues related to the education of Arizonas children, and engaging in limited political activism, and intends to operate pursuant to section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code.
What it reported doing in 2023
We have hired a lobbyist who has represented us in many discussions with lawmakers, aided school leaders in building relationships with our legislators, and continued to assist us with informing our parents about what is going on in our legislature and how they can be involved in the process. He has also assisted us in building a coalitions of support and dialogue with other groups outside of our membership and has assisted in building the number of schools engaged in our membership.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.3%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 97.1%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36.8%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.4; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 52.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.3% of revenue deployed · 97.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.