Arizona Burn Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860207519
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6022302041
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,706,034
Expenses
$2,411,194
Assets
$1,606,822
Liabilities
$426,664

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • REX ALBRIGHT (PRIOR CEO)
  • BRIDGET DOHERTY (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • REX ALBRIGHT (PRIOR CEO): $177,048 total reported compensation
  • BRIDGET DOHERTY (CEO): $109,166 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the quality of life of burn survivors and their families while promoting burn prevention, advocacy, and education.

What it reported doing in 2024

Client care services: an integrated system of care for burn survivors and their families to provide comprehensive services over time at all stages of their journey - crisis, recovery and thrive. See program descriptions below: crisis care: in crisis care the foundation provides families of burn patients the emotional and financial support needed in the midst of their crisis. When a patient is admitted to a burn facility, one of the foundation's staff members can be there to offer support to the family. The foundation offers lodging, transportation services and meal vouchers that are free of charge to the families. These services help alleviate stress and offer much needed hope in those early stages of the crisis. Recovery care: recovery care begins once a burn survivor is discharged from the burn facility. Arizona burn foundation assesses the needs of the burn survivor and their family and creates a care plan appropriate for them. The foundation may provide durable medical equipment, prescription payment, lodging for return clinic visits or financial assistance with rent, utilities or food if this need is not met by other means. For long-term needs, the foundation will refer clients to other agencies, helping a family through the process of completing paperwork and requirements for those agencies. Thrive: youth and family support: the goal of Arizona burn foundation is to help provide the emotional support needed for a burn survivor and their family to thrive. In this stage of the continuum of care model the foundation offers social gatherings where organic peer-to- peer support can take place. A burn injury affects the entire family, so while camps offer peer-to-peer support for burn survivors, these social gatherings create opportunities for the whole family to connect with other families who have gone through similar experiences. The foundation also provides funding to burn survivors to attend burn conferences such as world burn congress and angel faces.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.5%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 60.6%; rating input score 61
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -41.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.9%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.5% of revenue deployed · 60.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $177K · 14 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.