Arizona Association of Health Care Lawyers

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860689978
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6024326192
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$75,310
Expenses
$53,753
Assets
$60,384
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Melissa Soliz (President)
  • Kellie Manders (Co Vice President)
  • Claudia Stedman (Co Vice President)
  • Lauren Weinzweig (Co Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Melissa Soliz (President)
  • Susan Russo (Secretary)
  • Benjamin Runkle (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Exempt organization is a business league for healthcare lawyers. We improved business conditions for healthcare lawyers through providing continuing legal education, holding an annual conference focused on healthcare law, and providing scholarships for law students seeking to work in healthcare law.

What it reported doing in 2025

1. Annual Conference provided continuing education in healthcare law for over 100 people. 2. Scholarship event honored 6 law students entering into healthcare law and raised awareness of agency and its programming for persons in attendance. 3. Provided monthly lunchtime continuing legal education focused on healthcare law, monthly executive board meetings, and quarterly full board meetings.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 43.4%; rating input score 43
  • Program expense ratio: 60.8%; rating input score 61

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.6%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 43.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 43.4% of revenue deployed · 60.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.