Arizona Antelope Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860713493
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Mesa, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6027933515
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Wildlife Preservation, Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $295,064
- Expenses
- $353,230
- Assets
- $297,718
- Liabilities
- $2,625
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Terry Schupp (Past President)
- Glen Dickens (Vice President)
- Dave Cagle (President)
People named in this filing
- Terry Schupp (Past President)
- Glen Dickens (Vice President)
- Dave Cagle (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Conservation & Restoration of Antelope & their Habitat in Arizona. Conservation projects intended to protect, enhance, improve and connect viable & critical antelope habitat in Arizona
What it reported doing in 2025
The last half of 2024 and most of 2025 was one of the driest periods in AZ history. Wildlife was stressed by these extra dry periods and permanent waters required supplemental water hauling to keep them from drying out. Maintaining and increasing permanent wildlife accessible water for pronghorn is a priority of our mission. We funded a variety of wildlife water enhancing projects: 1)Partnering with the Arizona Sportsmans for Wildlife Conservation, Arizona Elk Society, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, and Mule Deer Foundation to fund a new 17 mile long water delivery system with nine wildlife drinkers in northern Arizona; 2) Partnering with federal agencies and landowners to fund a well conversion from diesel to solar power in southeastern Arizona; 3) Restoring a well and storage system to provide permanent water to Sonoran pronghorn and other desert wildlife; 4) Partnering with the Arizona Desert Bighorn Sheep Society and Arizona Deer Association to purchase a new 1,000 gallon water trailer, which was donated to a Wildlife Manager facilitating the filling of critical waters in a desert area; 5)Purchasing a new 750 gallon water trailer that was donated to the Tucson Arizona Game and Fish Department region, as the existing water trailers were wearing out from continual hauling over rough roads; and 6)Contributing towards a new water delivery system in the newly purchased Goodwater Ranch located in Unit 2A east of Holbrook. We contibuted $49,723 of funds toward these 6 water projects. We also partnered with the Arizona Desert Bighorn Sheep Society to purchase and modify a new bighorn sheep and pronghorn transportation trailer. We contributed $16,605 and volunteer labor to make this trailer operational, so captured bighorn sheep and pronghorn can be safely transported to new approved release sites to bolster populations of these two iconic species. We sponsored the Auction of two of the States Commissioner Antelope Tags, that are sold to the highest bidder. We collect those funds on behalf of the Arizona Game & Fish Department (such as in 2025, when collected $215,000) and then 100% of those funds are transferred to the Arizona Game & Fish Department. Any costs associated with those efforts are paid by us or shared with other 501(C)(3) organizations. The Arizona Game & Fish Department then uses 100% of those proceeds for Special Habitat or Scientific Research for those species.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $325K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.