Arise and Shine Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922375884
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8186746966
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $591,941
- Expenses
- $373,135
- Assets
- $526,179
- Liabilities
- $-277
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Malinda Willia (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Malinda Willia (CEO): $48,260 total reported compensation
- Lisa Sorensen (Secretary): $12,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To partner with educational institutions, corporations, community & government organizations and more to implement and support programs that advance the development of women and girls
What it reported doing in 2024
The E.S.T.E.A.M Project
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 44% for direct work, 8% for grants, and 48% for affiliated organizations.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 14
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 79.1%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 188.7% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 54.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 52.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50% of revenue deployed · 79.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $295K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $48K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.