Arisa Health Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844286440
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Springdale, AR, USA
- Phone
- 4799734200
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $79,359,553
- Expenses
- $81,741,970
- Assets
- $63,387,364
- Liabilities
- $13,269,417
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
67 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Laura H Tyler (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Kyle E Johnson (Chief Medical Officer): $443,971 total reported compensation
- Muhammad A Khan (Psysch/MD): $328,434 total reported compensation
- Jarrod R Adkisson (Psysch/MD): $324,501 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To lead with exceptional care that nurtures health and well-being for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
Clinical program services including: outpatient, rehabilitative day, therapeutic day treatment, school based counseling, assertive community treatment, forensic services including therapeutic communities, crisis stabilization, residential substance abuse services, therapeutic foster care, medication assisted treatment and prescriber services for 27,730 clients in 41 counties of north Arkansas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 82% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.3%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 79.4%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 95.8%; rating input score 96; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 29.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.3% of revenue deployed · 79.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 55 of 55 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $64.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $444K · 67 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
- Consistency: 48 of 49 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.