Argonne Local 742

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
362154329
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Argonne, IL, USA
Phone
7083622306
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$24,801
Expenses
$41,522
Assets
$72,741
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brian Poncin (President)
  • Noel Gonzalaz (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Brian Poncin (President)
  • Noel Gonzalaz (Vice President)
  • Steven Macewko (Secretary Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Executive Board (President, Vice President, Recording Secretary, Secretary-Treasurer, Trustees (3), Conductor-Sentinel), Auditors, Communicator and Committeemen for IAM Local Lodge #742 at Argonne National Laboratory, located in Argonne, Illinois.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Executive Board and Committeemen of Local Lodge 742 are responsible for representing ~140 machinists and technicians located at Argonne National Laboratory. The Executive Board runs the monthly union meetings and maintains accurate recording-keeping of the money held in several bank accounts. They are also responsible for paying bills on-time and performing financial audits twice a year. The Committeemen are local representation of the union in certain buildings around the Lab, and members of the Union can go to them if they have issues or questions with the work around the Lab.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -67.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.75; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.