Areivim Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824856821
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9296045397
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $890,025
- Expenses
- $1,090,388
- Assets
- $47,399
- Liabilities
- $288,178
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ZVI BOJARSKI (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ISAAC VAN ETTEN (CFO, SECRETARY): $32,750 total reported compensation
- ZVI BOJARSKI (CEO): $2,083 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable purposes within the meaning of I.R.C. 501(c)(3). These purposes shall include, but not limited to, addressing a spectrum of critical needs in society. We actively assist vulnerable and economically disadvantaged individuals by providing essential support in medical, economic, and legal matters, concurrently advocating for justice and equality for those in need. Engaging in impactful policy work within the criminal justice system, we strive for systemic improvements through targeted programs. Our dedication extends to aiding individuals in their reentry and rehabilitation journeys, ensuring a smoother transition and long-term well-being. Moreover, we respond to humanitarian needs, providing support in times of crisis.
What it reported doing in 2024
Team protect is a project which is dedicated to educating communities to reduce child tragedies, focusing on pool and car safety. Team protect staff and volunteer teams work closely with families and local institutions. technological solutions and products designed to safeguard children are promoted and are shipped directly to applicants. over 12,000 of Clever Elly devices, which reminds drivers to check the back seat every time one parks the car, have been distributed, many times free of charge. Pool safety equipment includes various alarms, sensors and camera monitors. the price of the popular coral Mylo system is subsidized for those who have financial necessity. its website is www.teamprotect.org
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 68% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $568.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 15.2%; rating input score 15; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -22.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 6.08; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 76.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 58.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 56.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $965K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $33K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.