Area Residential Care Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
420936800
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Dubuque, IA, USA
Phone
5635567560
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,067,632
Expenses
$9,288,583
Assets
$15,191,164
Liabilities
$668,696

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Pamela Crawford (President)
  • Guy Gard (Vice President)
  • Susan Freeman Murdah (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Susan Freeman Murdah (Executive Director): $115,844 total reported compensation
  • Noreen Akeang (Direct Support Professional): $104,882 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

It is the mission of Area Residential Care to empower people with intellectual disabilities to achieve their highest quality of life.

What it reported doing in 2024

Area Residential Care gives people the supervision and assistance they need to learn the skills that will help them achieve their highest quality of life.ICF (Intermediate Care Facility for persons with intellectual disabilities) Licensed Homes:*8 bed homes integrated in neighborhoods within Dubuque for those in need of more intense training in basic living skills and/or behavior management.*1:3 or 1:2 staff ratio during the most active portion of their day. Statement Continued on Schedule O.Program Service Statement Continued:*Physical restraints may be used for behaviors if stated in their plan. *Must meet 3 areas of need in major life activities:*Ambulation/Mobility*Musculoskeletal Disabilities*Activities of Daily Living*Eating Skills*Elimination*Sensorimotor*Maladaptive Behaviors*Understanding/Use of Language*Vocational/Social*Healthcare (nursing services provided)RCF (Residential Care Facility for persons with intellectual disabilities):*5 bed homes located throughout Dubuque for those in need of minimal assistance with personal care and supervision.*Staff provide training and assistance in food prep, laundry, shopping, budgeting, and other skills that lead to more independent living.*Majority of self-care tasks can be completed without significant physical assistance.*1:5 staff ratio*Behaviors can be controlled without physical restraint.*Do not require nursing care.HCBS (Home Community Based Services):*5 bed homes located throughout Dubuque and Dyersville for those who need minimal assistance in:*Skill development*Respite*Transportation*Other supports as needed*Comparable to renting with roommates*All bills are split equally amongst residents.Apartment Community Living Services:*These services are available in Dubuque and Dyersville.*For those with very independent living skills, living alone or with others*Apartment Services range from 24 hour site-based services to very independent living where consumers may only have contact with staff a few hours a month.*Staff check in routinely to provide needed support and run programs.*Daily, weekly, or monthly depending on need and units provided.Vocational Programs:*Sheltered Employment for ICF/ID *Subcontract work is brought in from local industries, where workers with disabilities perform job tasks under close staff supervision. *1:2 to 1:6 staff ratio during work time.*Behavioral, social, and skill training are a significant part of the services offered in this setting.Supported/Community Employment Enclaves:*Employment opportunities for people with disabilities are offered at many businesses and industries in Dubuque, Dyersville, and surrounding areas.*Workers report to the community business and perform work at that site, alongside other employees of the business.*Area Residential Care staff supervise the consumer during their scheduled shift, depending on need and independence.*Staff is the liaison with the business owner and consumers working.Mobile Work Crew:*Work crew that consists of 4-8 workers with disabilities and a staff member/crew foreman.*Crew members work semi-independently with the assistance of their crew foreman.*Foreman provides members assistance in building skills toward a more independent job in the future.*The crew works at a number of businesses each day; moving from one business to another. *Staff provide transportation in an agency vehicle.Independent Supported Employment:*Wide variety of employment opportunities almost exclusively integrated within the community for those with disabilities.*Job coaches are assigned to each worker to provide one-on-one training on each job task.*As workers increase their skill level, natural work environment supports are phased in and direct job coaching is phased out. ICF: Our ICF programs serve 24 individuals with intellectual disabilities in residential and day programming. Individuals require 24-hour staff support with a ratio of 3 clients per 1 staff person. Residential programs are offered in 3, 8-bed homes t

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.6%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 75.6%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.2 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.64; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.6% of revenue deployed · 75.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $116K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 35 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 7/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.