Archway Institute for Mental Health and Addictive Disorders
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462500358
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Punta Gorda, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3146358887
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $600,183
- Expenses
- $627,366
- Assets
- $674,463
- Liabilities
- $390
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN STUCKEY (CEO (PARTIAL YEAR))
- EMILY STUCKEY (CEO (PARTIAL YEAR))
- MATT BROWN (CEO (PARTIAL YEAR))
Highest reported compensation
- MATT BROWN (CEO (PARTIAL YEAR)): $73,077 total reported compensation
- EMILY STUCKEY (CEO (PARTIAL YEAR)): $48,219 total reported compensation
- JOHN STUCKEY (CEO (PARTIAL YEAR)): $7,692 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve the community by providing education to increase awareness and transform perspectives around substance use and co-occuring mental health disorders. As an organization, we advocate for long-term recovery by providing peer support and financial assistance to expand access to care and healthy solutions.
What it reported doing in 2025
Further education with respect to addiction and mental health disorders through funding of individuals and organizations involved in the study and research of these disorders, sponsoring or holding programs, symposiums and lectures to those working in the field of mental health and addiction medicine, as well as to families and friends of those suffering from addiction and mental health issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.6%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 26.4%; rating input score 26; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.6%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.6% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $550K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $73K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 28 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.