Arcadia Pupil Support Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364960073
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Arcadia, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6268218371
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,290
- Expenses
- $62,660
- Assets
- $44,528
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Stephanie Perez (President)
- Tamara Kohnke (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Stephanie Perez (President)
- Tamara Kohnke (Vice President)
- J Nicole Reed Brooks (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Arcadia Pupil Support Services consists of School Counselors, School Psychologists, Speech & Pathology Language Specialists, Nurses, and Program Specialists. Our primary purpose is to represent our members in their relations with our employer (the Arcadia Unified School District)in all matters relating to employment conditions and employer-employee topics as indicated in our contract, including but not limited to wages, hours, terms and conditions of employment, and continuous study and action on problems/challenges of the profession. We encourage cooperation and communication between our association and the district.
What it reported doing in 2024
Arcadia Pupil Support Services consists of School Counselors, School Psychologists, Speech & Pathology Language Specialists, Nurses, and Program Specialists. Our primary purpose is to represent our members in their relations with our employer (the Arcadia Unified School District)in all matters relating to employment conditions and employer-employee topics as indicated in our contract, including but not limited to wages, hours, terms and conditions of employment, and continuous study and action on problems/challenges of the profession.Accomplishments include:1) Satisfactory total compensation package negotiations and agreements with district/employer2) Continuing advocacy for positions and appropriate duties/responsibilities for members3) Data-driven progress to better meet student needs and develop resources (e.g. focus on mental health and wellness)4) Creation of Small Sub-Committees and Forums for continuing study and growth of student needs and resources to be addressed by members and appropriate district/employer representatives5) Continuing advocacy for educational issues and topics
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.9%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.9% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $55K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.