Arc of Shelby County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
371777624
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Shelbyville, IN, USA
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Disabled Persons' Rights

Reported finances

Revenue
$110,158
Expenses
$73,892
Assets
$269,447

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Hollyanne Forville (Manager)
  • Mickey Pottenger (Supervisor)
  • Don Collins (Manager)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote and protect the health safety and education and human rights of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities hereinafter I DD and to actively support their full inclusion and participation in the community and surrounding area.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our Sensory Gym called Senses is open to the public to serve young children of all abilities ages 1 through 6 years. We have sessions on Tuesday Thursday Friday and Saturday. We will have served almost 2,500 children and their parents or caregivers this year. That will be a new record for the 10 years we have been open. The average number for a session is 12 children. Parents that have children with special needs are also provided personal sessions if that is what is recommended by the therapist serving the family. We do our very best to ensure that every child can enjoy the benefits the gym offers to everyone.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.3%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32.9%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.65; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 42.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 58.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.3% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $62K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.