Arab Hope Ministry Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452869815
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Sarasota, FL, USA
Phone
9419283210
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ethnic, Immigrant Centers
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$109,038
Expenses
$93,071
Assets
$56,436
Liabilities
$1,798

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Toufik Hales (President)

People named in this filing

  • Toufik Hales (President)
  • Caryn Hales (Secretary / Treasurer)
  • Merl Beiler (Chairman)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide assistance, encouragement & networking for minority ethnic individuals; educate American public on needs of minority ethnic individuals; assist churches in reaching out to minority ethnic individuals

What it reported doing in 2013

Conducted annual conference (200 attendees) - provides encouragement for minority ethnic individuals; provides education & networking opportunities for individuals interested in meeting needs of minority ethnic individuals

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, and 34% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 41.1%; rating input score 41
  • Program expense ratio: 48.1%; rating input score 48

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.6%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 39.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 49.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 34.5% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 41.1% of revenue deployed · 48.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $45K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.