Apportionment Us Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263734752
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Wildomar, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9516789955
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Public Interest Law
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT SCHARPEN (President)
- DAVID LIESENFELT (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- SCOTT SCHARPEN (President)
- DAVID LIESENFELT (Vice President)
- RICHARD CROW (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Apportionment.US, Inc. defends human and civil rights in general, and voting rights in particular, applying the principle of "one person, one vote." Apportionment.US educates the public about the Constitution in general, and specifically about the principles for apportioning representatives in the House of Representatives among the states. Apportionment.US'S primary activity is litigating to defend the right of citizens of the various states to equal representation in the U.S. House of Representatives in a manner consistent with the requirements of the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court decisions. Apportionment.US is litigating an initial test case, with the possibility of follow-up litigation to ensure that the "one person, one vote" principle is applied in apportioning representatives in Congress among the states.The educational activities include materials on the Corporation's website (including links to relevant material on other websites), media interviews and articles or columns
What it reported doing in 2019
Apportionment.US, Inc. defends human and civil rights in general, and voting rights in particular, applying the principle of "one person, one vote." Apportionment.US educates the public about the Constitution in general, and specifically about the principles for apportioning representatives in the House of Representatives among the states. Apportionment.US'S primary activity is litigating to defend the right of citizens of the various states to equal representation in the U.S. House of Representatives in a manner consistent with the requirements of the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court decisions. Apportionment.US is litigating an initial test case, with the possibility of follow-up litigation to ensure that the "one person, one vote" principle is applied in apportioning representatives in Congress among the states.The educational activities include materials on the Corporation's website (including links to relevant material on other websites), media interviews and articles or columns, and public speaking to interested audiences.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: NotEnoughData
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -31.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -49.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2011 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.