Appletree Institute for Education Innovation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043331760
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2025261503
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,006,059
- Expenses
- $20,440,008
- Assets
- $16,327,886
- Liabilities
- $6,594,104
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM J MCCARTHY (PRESIDENT &)
- CHAVAUGHN BROWN (CO-CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM J MCCARTHY (PRESIDENT &): $334,085 total reported compensation
- CHAVAUGHN BROWN (CO-CEO): $261,697 total reported compensation
- THOMAS KEANE JR (GENERAL COUN): $248,869 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the institute is to provide three and four year olds with social, emotional, and cognitive foundations they need to thrive in kindergarten and beyond.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ati is a Washington, dc-based nonprofit committed to providing young children with the social, emotional, and cognitive foundations they need to thrive in kindergarten and beyond. Ati is achieving its mission in three related ways: research and innovation. Ati is a research organization that seeks to understand and address the teaching and learning challenges facing young children. As part of its ongoing research activities, ati in 2010 began development of a proprietary, comprehensive, and evidence-based instructional model, called every child ready, for three- and four-year-old children. Every child ready was developed with support from a us department of education reading first grant, a five-year investing in innovation grant (also from the us department of education), as well as with funding from numerous major philanthropies. Approximately 183 non-appletree classrooms in the district of columbia, Connecticut, Missouri, New York city, and Texas now use every child ready or its related products and services. Ati is constantly improving and refining every child ready based upon its real-world use in these schools as well as its own ongoing research and evolving best practices in the field of early education. In addition, ati is a thought leader in its field, working with federal, state, and local policymakers and advocates to understand the conditions required to improve earlyeducation outcomes. Direct education of children. In school year 2024-2025, ati provided full-school management for approximately 495 three- and four-year-old students in Washington, dc, at achievement prep charter school, learn dc public charter school, rocketship rise public charter school, rocketship legacy public charter school, and rocketship infinity community public charter school. In addition, appletree managed the early-education program at harmony dc public charter school. All these schools use atis every child ready instructional model. Support for other early-education schools. Ati provided the every child ready instructional model to the eight campuses of appletree early learning public charter school (aelpcs) in school year 2024-2025. Ati also provided certain administrative services and grants and shared wrap around services and consulting services to aelpcs, and, in addition, leases and subleases facilities to aelpcs. Ati and aelpcs are related parties as they share common board members. Atis expert staff of educators also supported other charter schools and community service organizations in Washington, dc, as well as charter schools in Missouri, New York city, and Texas. Ati provided these schools with every child ready curriculum and related products and services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.8%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.8% of revenue deployed · 87.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $334K · 26 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $819K reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 18 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.