Aof Hadley Gardens Affordable Housing Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820798057
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
7709370377
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$63,407
Expenses
$53,368
Assets
$2,405
Liabilities
$14,355

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PHILIP J KENNEDY (PRESIDENT, TRUSTEE)
  • KATHRYN T WALKER (VICE PRESIDENT, TRUSTEE)

People named in this filing

  • PHILIP J KENNEDY (PRESIDENT, TRUSTEE)
  • ROBERT R DERRICK (TRUSTEE)
  • WILLIAM F FISHER III (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To foster, support, provide, develop, acquire, construct, rehabilitate and/or operate qualified affordable housing for low-to-moderate income persons and families, elderly persons and/or mentally or physically disabled persons.

What it reported doing in 2024

General partnership interest in a partnership that provides 151 affordable housing units to low-income, elderly and/or totally disabled persons and families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 48% for direct work, and 52% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.2%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.8%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 5.97; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $53K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.