Anuraag Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263320542
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Cary, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9198020336
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $118,122
- Expenses
- $98,561
- Assets
- $237,952
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MURALI MANOHAR SAGILI (PRESIDENT)
- SUJATHA REDDY SAGILI (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MURALI MANOHAR SAGILI (PRESIDENT)
- SUJATHA REDDY SAGILI (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SREENIVASA AVULA (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of Anuraag Foundation is to provide assistance to slum dwellers and rural population in India by providing special education to mentally challenged persons and also by preventing the possibility of mental retardedness by early intervention, training and rehabilating the mentally challenged and providing medical services and health education to women, children and disabled.
What it reported doing in 2025
Anuraag Foundation provided financial support for providing special education and vocational programs for the needy mentally challenged children, for providing educational sponsorship, for establishing corpus fund, for designing and implementing the programs to create awareness about mentally challenged and mother education programs for providing health education and counselling, to receive professional support and guidance from India organization's leadership to better spread the awareness about the cause and to motivate to inculcate the habits of giving to the society in US
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.5%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0.6%; rating input score 1
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.6%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.41; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.5% of revenue deployed · 0.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $561 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.