Anume Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464902091
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
La Grange, TX, USA
Phone
7134107061
Rating
41
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$700
Expenses
$1,100
Assets
$14
Liabilities
$311

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VICTORIA VELARDE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CHELSEA MYTYK SCHLEGEL (DIRECTOR)
  • JOHN FERGUSON (DIRECTOR)
  • MICHAEL NAVARRO (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Anume foundation's primary exempt purpose is to grow organic vegtables and feed area food banks.

What it reported doing in 2024

Hosting volunteers/interns to serve on the farm:*hosting volunteers involves recruitment, email invitation, confirmation of attendance and directions to the farm. Organizing day's events for volunteers, conducting safety discussions, completion of insurance & legal paperwork, monitoring volunteers and conducting exit interview. Organizing paperwork while maintaining mailing list of volunteers, hours of volunteering and value of volunteer.*hosting of interns involves recruitment at senior level high schools and universities, letters of confirmation of dates to serve at farm, decisions on wether they are paid or volunteering and where they will reside should they live on the farm during summer internship or drive to and from their home. Interns receive daily instructions, monitoring, lunch, saftey discussions, seminiar attendance and networking opportunities from educational series.2024 - 0 volunteers

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -57.1%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 22.21; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -20.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.