Antiques & Garden Show of Nashville Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
621444411
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Nashville, TN, USA
Phone
6153521282
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,586,838
Expenses
$3,476,838
Assets
$1,356,336
Liabilities
$27,743

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

People named in this filing

  • CAMERON WELLS (DIRECTOR)
  • CHRIS HILTON (BOARD CHAIR)
  • DEBBIE BEST (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The antiques & garden show of nashville is an annual charity event whose purpose is to raise funds for cheekwood botanical garden & museum of art and the economic club of nashville (econ) charities, inc., by exhibiting the highest quality of antiques, landscaped gardens and horticultural items and by offering a related educational outreach program.

What it reported doing in 2024

1) from january 31st february 2nd, 2025 the antiques and garden show of nashville celebrated its 35th year at the music city center. The show has been held there since it opened in 2013 and proved to be another successful year. Many previous dealers returned along with new ones to bring a fresh perspective to the audience. The show opened on thursday evening with the traditional benefactor's reception from 5:30 to 6:30 where 400+ benefactors and vip guests celebrated the kickoff of the show. The preview party followed from 6:30 to 9:30pm where over 1,800 guests enjoyed heavy hors d'oeuvres and a great preview of all the vendor booths and spectacular gardens. The show opened on friday morning and continued through sunday afternoon. Attendance was estimated to be approximately 17,000 which was considered successful. Tickets were purchased from a variety of states with the majority being in the southeast region. We continued to streamline expenses wherever possible utilizing volunteers, securing in-kind donations and targeting marketing through increased social media exposure. 2) the antiques and garden show was honored to present a stellar lineup of lecture guests once again for the 2025 show. Celebrating the 35th year, the chairmen were delighted for brooke shields and david flint wood, moderated by india hicks to be the featured keynote lecture on friday morning. The keynote lecture had great attendance of 1421 people. The chairmen invited bunny williams and elizabeth lawrence to serve as honorary chairman. Sheryl crow, lauren akins, and april tomlin moderated by kelleigh bannen made up the friday afternoon lecture, which had excellent attendance of over 1500 people. The saturday morning lecture consisted of florists, shane connolly and willow crossley, moderated by margo shaw. The afternoon was a design panel featuring rita konig and veere grenney, moderated by dara capanigro. There were book signings following both lectures. Both saturday lectures sold over 1,400 tickets. The keynote event was sponsored by milieu magazine. 3) the bourbon party was hosted on friday evening, targeting a young 25-40-year-old crowd. We partnered with brown-forman and hosted the event in the center garden on the show floor. A new audience of guests were introduced to the antiques market, educated about design and lifestyle entertaining while enjoying southern food and bourbon tastings. They were also able to shop the show floor before and during the party and exposed to extraordinary gardens and landscape architect professionals who elevated the bar regarding educating the audience on appreciation of gardens. The bourbon party sold 972 total tickets.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 67% for direct work, and 33% for affiliated organizations.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 95.5%; rating input score 95
  • Fundraising efficiency: $34.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -34.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $102K reported
  • Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.