Antioch Rivertown Senior Housing Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943135213
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Walnut Creek, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5106326712
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $59
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LESLIE TAYLOR (PRESIDENT)
- GAIL GILMAN - THRU 062024 (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- CYNTHIA ALVAREZ (COO/INTERIM PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- GAIL GILMAN - THRU 062024 (PRESIDENT & CEO): $335,209 total reported compensation
- CYNTHIA ALVAREZ (COO/INTERIM PRESIDENT & CEO): $329,393 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide subsidized housing (50 unit) for elderly low income seniors under section 202 of the national housing act and the u.s. Department of housing and urban development.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 1
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 111,437.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.9% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $59 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $335K · 6 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 40 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.