Antelope Valley High School Alumni Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274508644
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2012
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Lancaster, CA, USA
Phone
6613417669
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alumni Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$26,755
Expenses
$3,707
Assets
$24,082

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To bring the Alumni of the Antelope Valley High School back together again.

What it reported doing in 2012

1.) Engage the Alumni from the Antelope Valley High School to become active members again, by working together on behalf of the community, as identified in the AVHS Alumni Association Charter Documents. 2.) Developed a fully functional web site; i.e. www.avhsalumni.org 3.) Developed a "Pro-Tem" Board of Directors for the Antelope Valley High School Alumni Association. 4.) Developed Charter Documents; "Consitution and By-Laws" for the Organization. 5.) Held the (AVHS Centennial (1912 - 2012) "all-class" Reunion), on October 13, 2012 at the Antelope Valley Fair Grounds. Over 1,000 people were in attendance. From class years 1943 through 2013. 6.) Created Antelope Valley High Alumni Association merchandise (T-Shirts & Mugs) for resale / fundrasing. 7.) Awarded two scholarships to Antelope Valley High School Students on May 8, 2012 8.) Received several "donations" from several Alumni Members 9.) Instrumental in re-creating the old school newsletter called; "Sandpaper Alumni Edition". 10.) Instrumental in creating and maintaining an AVHS Alumni Association "Membership".

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 86.1%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.5; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.