Another Chance to Win Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
852362065
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
4439228596
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Rehabilitation Services for Offenders
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$37,786
Expenses
$33,583
Assets
$8,591
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHARON PITCHFORD (PRESIDENT)
  • EDWARD PITCHFORD (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SHARON PITCHFORD (PRESIDENT)
  • EDWARD PITCHFORD (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KAREN WILKES (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To spread the word of jesus christ

What it reported doing in 2025

Another Chance to Win, Inc.(ACT Win)is a 501(c)(3)nonprofit organization based in Baltimore, Maryland. ACT Win was established to restore safety, stability, and hope for women and youth impacted by incarceration, violence, trauma, and poverty. ACT Win supports Baltimore students by providing food, toiletries, school dues, and college students with essentials ensuring they have the resources needed to thrive academically and emotionally. At the same time, ACT Win empowers women rebuilding their lives after incarceration and women fleeing domestic violence with dignity, advocacy, and holistic support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.1%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 96.9%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.1%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 64.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.1% of revenue deployed · 96.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.