Annies Project-education for Farm Women
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263995913
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Woodlawn, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6182376441
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $375,374
- Expenses
- $393,199
- Assets
- $178,862
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Doris Mold (co-CEO)
- Karisha Devlin (co-CEO)
- Sam Schwoeppe (President)
- Jason Johnson (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Doris Mold (co-CEO): $88,593 total reported compensation
- Karisha Devlin (co-CEO): $88,593 total reported compensation
- Ruth Hambleton (Treasurer): $9,949 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of Annie's Project-Education for Farm Women (APEFW) is to empower women in agriculture to be successful through education, networks, and resources. APEFW conducts training for facilitators who, in turn, deliver Annie's Project classes using the Annie's Project Methodology which means small groups; safe, dynamic, and interactive class environment, vetted presenters, and unbiased research-based information. A local steering committee formed by the trained facilitator adapts the program to the area of delivery by selecting relevant and specific topics. Core values of the program are safe harbor, shared experiences, discovery, and connection. The result is a confident farm woman with improved business decision-making skills, and a network of peers and professionals to support our participants and their communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Facilitator Training and Program Delivery: six training programs in 2025 added approximately 100 facilitators from 22 States, who in turn conducted 42 Annie's Project Programs in 20 states reaching 933 participants. Average size class was 22 participants. APEFW moved to online delivery for training and program delivery. Program delivery to participants was a combination of in person and online delivery. Online delivery includes podcast, and webinars. Other programs for 2025: Rural Resiliency Project and Cultivating Resiliency Program in collaboration with various organizations and Ag Stress Management Webinars, Suicide Prevention Training in cooperation with Farm Veteran Coalition. Annie's Project participated in Nebraska Women in Ag bookclub, and other programs where Annie's Project CEOs were invited to present and share the Annie's Project Program with their audiences. Webinars on a variety of subjects were recorded and are available through Annie's Project YouTube Channel. Annie's Project YouTube Channel contains all of Annie's Projects on-line national programs and are available to the public. Total education contacts in 2025 were 3465. All numbers combined represent 4,398 educational contacts in 2025. These numbers do not reflect our social media on Face Book and LinkedIn where another 5,000 "fans" have joined our pages. In 2023 Annie's Project entered a partnership with USDA Risk Management Agency (RMA) on a project called "Building Resiliency with a More Diverse Delivery Strategy, the Under-Served Agent/Loss Adjuster Training Program Pilot Program" It aimed to reach producers and individuals that had a livelihood in the space of agriculture. This collaborative pilot program's strategic engagement with minority-serving institutions and under served stakeholder groups established a pipeline of crop insurance agents and adjusters within the under served communities. The intent of the program was to increase the representation of insurance agents and loss adjusters providing service to under served producers. From 2023 and through March of 2025, Annie's Project enrolled 7 agents preparing for their licenses, 3 completed getting/renewing their licenses, and 21 crop insurance adjusters in training for their certification and job interviews with Approved Insurance Providers (AIP). Two agents were hired by local Approved Insurance Providers. Other deliverables for this project 1) Annie's Project invited all AIP's to participate in a meeting to answer questions on agents and adjusters. The following participated in sessions: Advanced Ag Protection, Rain & Hail, Crop Risk Services, Hudson, Agri-Sompo, Federal Crop Insurance Corp. We connected with 14 people from AIPs and National Crop Insurance Services. We also connected with Great American Insurance who reached out to us. We directly connected with 15 different people with seven different AIPs. 2) All adjuster candidates were provided support in resume & interview skills by Annie's Project staff. Some participated in the live workshop. All were provided with written materials from workshop (21 total) 3) Provided training and one-on-one connections to develop business plans, goals and market plans. Participants either participated live or via recording. We provided training for people with Annie's (29 people) and our partners. 4) Annie's Project hosted a Q & A session for participants to learn more about being an Agent or Adjuster from people who worked for or with AIPs. Potential adjusters had follow-up connections through National Crop Insurance Services job fairs. This project ended Mid-February of 2025. The resources we developed through the project continued to be used through 2025. The project's agreement number is 2022-RMAPILOT-2. Crop Insurance Education for the Under-served is a second partnership with Risk Management Agency where Annie's Project delivered 7 podcast covering topics of Why Do I Need Crop Insurance, How to Choose and Agent, Crop Rain/Hail Stand Along Poli
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 67% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 23
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 87.9%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $25.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.7%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 49.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 87.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $346K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $89K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.