Annie Walsh Old Girls Assoc Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521889143
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Silver Spring, MD, USA
- Phone
- 2029675512
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alumni Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $47,715
- Expenses
- $37,963
- Assets
- $174,481
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AUDREY PABSGARNON (PRESIDENT)
- EBUN TAYLOR (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- AUDREY PABSGARNON (PRESIDENT)
- EBUN TAYLOR (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BOIBETTY UDOM (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide financial support and assistance in promoting the academic, social and cultural goals of the annie walsh memorial school, an all girls high school in freetown, sierra leone.
What it reported doing in 2023
Scholarships to deserving students rehabilitation of school infrastructure: admin building, staff room and chapel teachers incentives and award
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 63% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 20
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 18.2%; rating input score 18
- Program expense ratio: 22.8%; rating input score 23
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.4%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.6; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12.1% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 18.2% of revenue deployed · 22.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 7 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.