Anita N Martinez Ballet Folkloric Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
751814458
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
Phone
2148280181
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$192,980
Expenses
$189,980
Assets
$117,444
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lisa Mesa-Rogers (Executive Director)
  • Rick Toussaint (President)

People named in this filing

  • Lisa Mesa-Rogers (Executive Director)
  • Anita N Martinez (Founder)
  • Rick Toussaint (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Performs and teaches satellite programs at elementary, middle, and high schools throughout the city of dallas. Over 100 free community programs annually.

What it reported doing in 2023

Anita N. Martinez Ballet Folklorico (ANMBF) proposes continuing its traditional programs with increased services in specific areas. We offer classes at our reduced tuition Dance Academy, held weekly at our dance studio in Old East Dallas. We look for opportunities to have our students present their seasonal Recital at well-known venues like the Latino Cultural Center. Although children are the primary students, our classes are available for all ages. Our ANMBF Performing Companies are excited about the possibility to perform at different venues in the DFW and the opportunities to perform with Live Music by our head Mariachi band.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.6%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.3%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.6% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2009 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.