Animals Rule Placement Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
134264510
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Pedro, CA, USA
Phone
3108329929
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$363,212
Expenses
$68,873
Assets
$566,331
Liabilities
$8,892

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michele Rizza (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Stephanie Crawford (CFO)
  • Shannon Evans (Secretary)
  • Margie Rust (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome animals in need, providing them with a second chance at a loving forever home.

What it reported doing in 2025

2025 Program Service Accomplishments: We found that 2025 was another year where dogs were shed from peoples lives for many and various reasons. Our rescue organization had no returns thanks to our screening process, but we did accept a record number of owner-surrendered dogs to help prevent the animals from re-entering the already overloaded shelter system. Once again, 2025 was a very interesting year to rescue and adopt animals.We found that there were still many people who had life changing experiences and found themselves needing to remove their dogs from their lives. Whether their dog was surrendered due to a move, a layoff, career change, straight-up financial difficulties or renter problems, our rescue organization stepped up to the plate. Our rescue intake and adoption numbers this year are still a little lower and slower than pre-Covid-19 times, but they have slowly been improving over the last five years. We feel that under the circumstances we did an outstanding job! We rescued a total of 65 animals in 2025, and we only lost 1 of those due to a critical medical condition. The breakdown of the 65 animals placed in 2025 is as follows; we saved a total of 11 dogs on their last day at our city and county shelters and we accepted 28 owner-surrendered dogs, thus preventing them from entering the shelter system. These dogs were surrendered to us for various reasons such as housing relocations, landlord problems, layoffs, unemployment, returning to work, and straight-up financial difficulties. We accepted 12 strays whose owners we were unable to locate, 7 dogs that were abandoned in housing, and 4 dogs from owners who passed away.In addition to all of this, we accepted 2 female dogs from a breeder who was finished breeding dogs. Breeders have also been very slow in moving their dogs. Our organization was able to assist 14 low income/homeless families with pet food and various forms of assistance throughout the year. Of the 65 animals we adopted, 62 were dogs, and 3 were guinea pigs.We accomplished all of this while struggling to recover financially from the pandemic ourselves, holding down jobs of our own, marriages and mortgages and this made for another crazy and difficult year. We are dedicated to the well-being of our rescue dogs and we love each and every one of them who pass through our rescue on their way to forever homes.Please help us to give back and help make a difference in the lives of homeless pets. Please dont buy, dont breed, Adopt! Respectfully from the Animals Rule officers and volunteers, we thank you and look forward to changing more lives in 2026 with your help.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 40
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 17.7%; rating input score 18
  • Program expense ratio: 89.4%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 81%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.22; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 17.7% of revenue deployed · 89.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $62K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.