Animal Recovery Mission Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300602348
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Port St Lucie, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3058076252
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,855,880
- Expenses
- $1,521,576
- Assets
- $3,038,395
- Liabilities
- $69,572
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICHARD COUTO (PRESIDENT &)
Highest reported compensation
- RICHARD COUTO (PRESIDENT &): $78,000 total reported compensation
- RACHEL TAYLOR (CFO): $60,800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To be an uncompromising defending force for the welfare of animals in addition to putting an end to, and preventing pain, suffering and torture inflicted as a result of inhumane practices.
What it reported doing in 2024
Arm, an investigative animal defense organization collaborates with various local, state, national and international agencies in order to eradicate illegal and barbaric treatment of animals to advance animal welfare. Since its incorporation in 2010, arm's animal cruelty investigations have led to: the successful execution of over 525 state, national, and international animal cruelty investigations. These resulted in the closure of 157 illegal animal slaughter, sacrifice, and fighting operations. 595 convictions of notorious animal killers, positive changes with 2 state laws and 5 county ordinances. The rehabilitation and lifetime quality care to over 300 animals that were transported to arm sanctuary in Florida. These victims were seized from animal cruelty operations conducted and raided by arm. 2019 highlight accomplishments: 1. As a part of its factory farm division, arm conducted a major four-part series of dairy farm investigations headlined by operation fair oaks farm (f.o.f). The three other investigations were; operation fair-life, operation natural prairie dairy, and operation strauss veal feeds. This investigation was considered to be the largest, and most impactful dairy investigation ever to be conducted in the united states by an animal welfare organization. This investigation was instrumental in exposing the truths of the systematic abuse and inherent cruelty associated within the dairy industry. With local, national, and international media taking the dairy investigations viral around the world, arrests, industry changes, civil action lawsuits, and protests quickly followed. 2. Operation strauss veal was instrumental in connecting the veal and dairy industries, and highlighted the exploitation and cruelty associated with newborn calves. The investigation's release led to worldwide media and public outcry demanding advancements in animal welfare standards for calves and dairy cows. 3.operation black cloud. Arm operatives collected incriminating video footage, including the dragging, handling, trading, stabbing, tormenting, hoisting, and butchering of farm animals. The slaughtering of animals was on all occasions in gross violation of the humane slaughter act. 4. Arm continued to conduct its frontline investigations in the state of Florida that address; black market horse slaughter, animal sacrifice, animal fighting, and illegal animal slaughter operations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 56
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.5%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 74%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.6 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.7%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.5% of revenue deployed · 74% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $78K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.