Animal Haven Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
436060706
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990 2010
Location
Merriam, KS, USA
Phone
9134327548
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,102,144
Expenses
$1,269,658
Assets
$646,828
Liabilities
$56,023

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule 0animal haven is one of greater Kansas city's largest non-profit, no-kill animal shelters. Animal haven serves the community as both a pet adoption center and as the largest organization that manages lost/stray pets for cities and municipalities in johnson county, Kansas. Animal haven cares for nearly 4,000 abandoned, abused and unwanted pets each year and works full time to reunite lost pets with their owners. Our primary objective is to place dogs and cats into lifelong, caring homes through adoptions and lost pet reunions and to provide a higher quality of life for homeless pets through education and collaboration with the animal welfare community.

What it reported doing in 2010

Admissions & lost pet services - nearly 3,600 dogs and cats were admitted to our no-kill shelter in 2010. Through contracts with 12 cities and municipalities in johnson county, Kansas, we were able to rehome nearly 1,000 lost dogs and cats. Lost and stray pets are brought by animal control officers to our facility where they are scanned for a microchip and/or a collar or identification tag in an effort to locate the owners. A total of 57% of all dogs and 6% of cats are rehomed through our services. Lost pet websites are searched and postings are made on various lost pet sites by volunteers and staff. Pets that are not reclaimed by their owners are placed up for adoption. If pets are reclaimed by their owners, administrative and boarding fees are charged to the owners of those pets. If pets that are unwanted or unable to be cared for by their owners are relinquished and accepted into our adoption program, a relinquishment fee is paid by the owner of the pet.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.2%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $68K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.