Animal Defense League of Arizona
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742493030
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6022657729
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $385,990
- Expenses
- $446,643
- Assets
- $1,113,133
- Liabilities
- $54,774
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHANIE NICHOLS-YOUNG (PRESIDENT)
- DJ SCHUBERT (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEPHANIE NICHOLS-YOUNG (PRESIDENT)
- DJ SCHUBERT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KAREN MICHAEL (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the animal defense league of Arizona is to protect and defend Arizona's animals.
What it reported doing in 2024
Companion animalsthe spay neuter hotline- provides spay/neuter services for pets and outdoor cats in Arizona.adla's telephone and web based spay/neuter hotline referral service continued statewide operations in 2024. It made referrals to pet spay and neuter programs and clinics throughout Arizona. Spay neuter hotline's largest operation provides trap, neuter, return (" tnr") services in maricopa county and surrounding areas, scheduling appointments at multiple veterinary clinics, lending humane traps and coaching caregivers on how to successfully trap cats. Adla fixed 7063 outdoor cats in 2024. We also continued to work closely with one municipality and began working with two others to provide trap, neuter, return services paid for by the each city for a small group of caregivers who needed assistance to cover surgery costs in their communities, and provided referrals for other trap, neuter, return programs around the state. Midwestern university clinics donated free spay and neuter services valued at $53,900.the hotline also made referrals to pet owners who needed low cost spay/ neuter or free services throughout the state and, in graham county provided vouchers for free spay/ neuter services at the desert cross clinic in thatcher. Together we helped 95 families, spaying and neutering a total of 73 cats and 80 dogs for them. Through adla's membership in the alliance for companion animals, it joined other organizations and local funders to continue fix adopt save, a campaign addressing dog and cat homelessness in maricopa county by providing pet spay/neuters, vaccines and microchips. Wildlifeadla's wildlife program focuses on protecting habitat and key species in Arizona. Adla monitors the Arizona game and fish commission and department. General education/outreach through its website, voicemail systems, virtual meetings and social media such as facebook, nextdoor and instgram, adla works to educate the public about issues affecting Arizona's animals.adla continued its involvement in the "voices for Arizona's animals!" campaign, encouraging members of the animal protection community to register to vote and to vote.legislativeadla volunteers monitored proposed legislation in Arizona so that it could comment on any pending measures affecting animals, support those that would benefit animals and oppose those that would be detrimental to animals. It also coordinated communications among a number of animal protection organizations and individual advocates who have an interest in legislation. It coordinated grassroots volunteers, and the work of peer organizations, acting as a resource for animal advocates and legislators on a variety of animal issues. It also provided support to rural shelters throughout Arizona to help them with their legislative agendas and to seek their input on pending legislation that might affect their work.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.7%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: $962.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.49; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $427K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.