Animal Defenders International Inc Us
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 030538111
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3239352234
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $986,350
- Expenses
- $1,649,690
- Assets
- $3,778,181
- Liabilities
- $414,149
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY JETT (Executive Director)
- JAN CREAMER (PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)
- TIMOTHY PHILLIPS (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
Highest reported compensation
- KIMBERLY JETT (Executive Director): $85,964 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To educate, create awareness, promote the interest of humanity in the cause of justice & the suppression of all forms of cruelty to animals, to alleviate suffering, conserve and protect animals in their environment.
What it reported doing in 2025
Animal Defenders International, Inc. educates and creates awareness of the suffering of animals used in commerce for example in entertainment, farming, experiments, as well as working on protection of wildlife and their environment. The Organization's scientific, economic and legal research reports and educational materials, all provide the information and evidence needed to support change and protect animals from suffering. Its investigations, reports and videos are often the catalyst for legal protection for animals. The Organization also rescues and relocates animals affected by changes in legislation, for example when countries prohibit the use of animals in traveling circuses and there are animals that need relocating, the Organization assists governments with collection of animals and relocating them to forever homes. The Organization also builds new habitats for its rescues at sanctuaries all over the world and it finances the care of the animals for life, as needed by its sanctuary partners. Donors can support the Organization's Animal Rescuer scheme, and fund the care of animals living in their protected, natural habitats. also builds new habitats for its rescues at sanctuaries all over the world and it finances the care of the animals for life, as needed by its sanctuary partners. Donors can support the Organization's Animal Rescuer scheme, and fund the care of animals living in their protected, natural habitats.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 45% for direct work, and 55% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: $81.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -67.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.29; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $86K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.