Animal Alliance of the Americas

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
921947921
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
6462806562
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Animal-Related N.E.C.

Reported finances

Expenses
$49,303
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$66,500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THOMAS P KLEIN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • THOMAS P KLEIN (PRESIDENT)
  • MARGARET CHAHOUD (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support on the ground operations in the greater minagua nicaragua area to facilitate safe and successful spay and neuter procedures for cats and dogs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Phase 1: to build upon the success in nicaragua and continue our work in the country focused on cats and dogs phase 2: to officially expand our organization in the country of mexico and el salvador phase 3: to continue to support the on the ground operations in the greater managua, nicaragua area as well as the greater merida, mexico area. A vast majority of funds were used to facilitate the safe and successful spay and neuter procedures for one hundred and twenty seven (127) cats and dogs these procedures resulted in hundreds of unwanted animals being saved from being put down due to overpopulation. Phase 4: to build upon the expansion in el salvador and launch education and awareness programs focused on communities all around the country. To raise awareness for the better treatment of cats and dogs through community focused events and campaigns. Phase 5: through this effort, our organization touched and made contact with over one thousand (1,000) people in person and over two hundred and fifty thousand (250,000) people via social media and other online campaigns.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 3 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.