Anima Mundi Productions

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271944408
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Phoenix, OR, USA
Phone
5418333066
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$191,089
Expenses
$193,855
Assets
$209,594
Liabilities
$4,272

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ethan Gans-Morse (Executive Director)
  • Richard Gordon (President, Secretary)

People named in this filing

  • Ethan Gans-Morse (Executive Director)
  • Lesa Terry (Board Member)
  • Richard Gordon (President, Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to create, present, and produce new musical works that harness the power of the arts to stir the soul, foster community, and address urgent societal and environmental challenges.

What it reported doing in 2024

New Artistic Commissions: Anima Mundi Productions commissions and premieres new works each season. These works address themes relevant to our community. In Fiscal Year 2024-25, the new works we premiered focused on the plight of Ukrainian musicians responding to the Russian invasion.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.5%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 64.4%; rating input score 64

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.5% of revenue deployed · 64.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $125K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.