Angels of Love Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680386298
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Tecate, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8054280689
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Deaf/Hearing Impaired Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $103,468
- Expenses
- $107,431
- Assets
- $27,413
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Luke Andrew Everett (President)
People named in this filing
- Luke Andrew Everett (President)
- Lucas Nash Everett (Secretary Director of Operations)
- Frances Cecilia Vazquez (Treasurer Director of Casa Maravillas)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific purpose of this corporation is to operate a nonprofit organization for the care education and maintenance of needy andor orphaned deaf children and adults
What it reported doing in 2024
Emergency situations for Deaf in Need Medical situations dental emergencies and more For example providing medical care and physical therapy for Josefina a Deaf Mexican woman providing a single Deaf mother Marisol baby supplies and products in her time of need provide to cover medical expense for a Deaf woman Jazmin who was experiencing neurological issues and housing improvements for a single Deaf father caring for his two sons
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.6%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 65.1%; rating input score 65
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.8%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.5% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.6% of revenue deployed · 65.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 11 filed program accomplishments · $70K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.