Angels-havinn Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 873723897
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Columbia, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3012463131
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Victims' Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,014
- Expenses
- $8,159
- Assets
- $7,491
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- April D Chambers (President & CEO)
- Christina Beale (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- April D Chambers (President & CEO)
- Christina Beale (Vice President)
- Brittney Kithcart (Chief Operating Officer (COO))
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide temporary, safe housing shelter support and auxiliary needs to battered women and children who suffer from domestic violence. Provide resources for healing the wounds of trauma. Educate survivors to build a supportive community. Increase public awareness of public community resources available to the broader community - to connect those affected by domestic violence or partner abuse with the following public resources options: shelters, transitional housing, treatment intervention programs, job placement, career-building programs, social workers and therapeutic professionals. Help battered victims to navigate self-care, self-love and self-esteem building. Teach battered victims what healthy relationships look like by guiding them toward a life of trauma wound healing.
What it reported doing in 2025
Miscellaneous Catering at weekly (Circle of Love) and monthly (Love Yourself) Member Support Events - 264 total attendees (FY 2025)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 29
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.3%; rating input score 27
- Program expense ratio: 33.4%; rating input score 33
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.5%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 27.3% of revenue deployed · 33.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.