Angels Closet Charities
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274531412
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Mentone, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9095831697
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Emergency Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $178,582
- Expenses
- $155,220
- Assets
- $185,665
- Liabilities
- $226
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PATRICIA WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
- TOM WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PATRICIA WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
- TOM WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CORRINE LANDEROS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide clothing and other necessities to less fortunate middle school and high school students within redlands California and surrounding areas enabling them to attend formal school events or to do job interviews.
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide clothing to less fortunate students enabling them to attend formal school events or participate in professional job interviews. Redlands school district provides a t wing room and 6 additional rooms to be used as a clothing boutique for middle school and high schools students. The fair market value of in-kind facilities rent is $34,560.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 6
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 5.6%; rating input score 6
- Program expense ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 6
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.1%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.2%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -14.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 5.6% of revenue deployed · 6.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.