Angels & Associates Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
481296943
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2024687525
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
AIDS

Reported finances

Revenue
$95,773
Expenses
$106,797
Assets
$1,686
Liabilities
$22,669

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jacqueline McReynolds (Executive director)
  • Mozell Brown (President)
  • Deborah E Turrentine (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Jacqueline McReynolds (Executive director)
  • Mozell Brown (President)
  • Iris Howard (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide housing, mental health services, and education to help alleviate, educate and/or rehabilitate those with HIV/AIDS, drug addiction and/or mental health issues.

What it reported doing in 2014

Housing, mental health services, and education to help alleviate, educate and/or rehabilitate those inflicted with HIV/AIDS, drug addiction and/or mental health issues.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.6%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 85.7%; rating input score 86

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.5%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 13.45; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.6% of revenue deployed · 85.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $92K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.