Angel Food Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

14 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Please see Schedule O.

Church Outreach/Religious Ministry Please see Schedule O.

Revenue model: Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: 33.4%; rating input score 33; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: -3%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.82; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 2.5%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $82.3M in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $887K · 14 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 33/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.