Angel Airlines for Veterans
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541851770
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Virginia Beach, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8888490507
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $129,753
- Expenses
- $125,065
- Assets
- $12,762
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robert Alpaugh (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Robert Alpaugh (CEO): $135,192 total reported compensation
- Linda Johnson (assistant secretary): $51,441 total reported compensation
- Joan Corkrum (Assistant Treasurer): $46,054 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Angel airlines for veterans ensures that no veteran is denied access to distant specialized medical evaluation, diagnosis or treatment for lack of means of long-distance transportation. We provide charitable airline tickets for urgent travel to facilities for financially and medically needy veterans for specialized medical evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment.
What it reported doing in 2016
Volunteer pilot mode patient travel program: volunteer pilots providing flights for ambulatory outpatients traveling less than 750 miles departing from district of columbia, Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia. Volunteer pilots providing flights for ambulatory outpatients traveling less than 750 miles departing from North Carolina, Tennessee are served by airlift hope.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.4%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.6%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -68.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $125K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $135K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2014 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.