Andrew Didomenico Memorial Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 995101109
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Meriden, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2032133168
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Private Grantmaking Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $67,646
- Expenses
- $15,274
- Assets
- $107,355
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- SHARI DIDOMENICO (DIRECTOR)
- VINCENZA DIDOMENICO (VICE PRESIDE)
- MELISSA LOMBARDI (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The andrew didomenico memorial foundation, inc. Is dedicated to honoring the life and legacy of andrew didomenico, a beloved 26-year-old who tragically lost his life on june 28, 2024, due to a senseless act of intoxicated driving while working for the state of Connecticut department of transportation. The foundations mission is to empower and inspire future generations by providing scholarships to high school seniors from meriden, ct, pursuing careers in trade work, higher education, or cdl (commercial drivers license) training. Through these scholarships and other meaningful charitable contributions, we aim to create opportunities for local students, fostering a legacy of hard work, dedication, and community service in andrews honor. Our foundation will also host annual fundraising events, including a golf tournament, to support these initiatives and further andrews spirit of giving.
What it reported doing in 2025
Granting scholarships and other meaningful donations in honor of andrew didomenico.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 19.8%; rating input score 20
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 77.4%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.03; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 64.5% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 19.8% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.