Anderson County Community Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931639510
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Missouri City, TX, USA
Phone
7132917648
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,250
Expenses
$8,000
Assets
$28,250

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Vernon Denmon (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Vernon Denmon (Executive Director)
  • Joyce Hansley (Treasurer)
  • Juanita Taylor (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Anderson County Community Council is organized exclusively for educational and charitable purposes within the meaning of 501(c)(3) of the IRS code of 1986 as amended and the regulations promulgated there under. To promote the appreciation and preservation of the history and culture of the old Lincoln and A M Story High Schools and to provide educational support and opportunities to graduating high school seniors in Anderson County. To gather, preserve, display, and make available for observation and study artifacts, relics, books, manuscripts, papers, and other records and materials relating to the history of the Lincoln A M Story communities in the City of Palestine TX. Erect a Community Center to house these items.

What it reported doing in 2025

Towards providing educational opportunities to graduating high school seniors the Anderson County Community Council awarded four scholarships to seniors to attend various colleges. Hosted a cleanup day on the old Lincoln School property; Hosted a community Alumni Breakfast on the old Lincoln School property - included various speakers and former students discussing history of the school and the significance of keeping the memory of it alive.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.53; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 91.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.