Anderson Center for Autism

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
141598279
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Jun 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Staatsburg, NY, United States
Phone
(845) 889-4034 Voice (845) 889-3104
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$48,567,828
Expenses
$48,994,722
Assets
$58,882,762
Liabilities
$20,497,126

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATRICK PAUL (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • PATRICK PAUL (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $702,258 total reported compensation
  • TINA COVINGTON (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $392,861 total reported compensation
  • TINA CHIRICO (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (ENDED 9/24)): $248,643 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Anderson’s Mission:** Optimizing the quality of life for individuals with autism. Anderson’s Vision:** Anderson Center for Autism as a world-class provider and leader. Anderson’s Agency Philosophy:** Anderson Center for Autism’s core philosophy is that all people deserve to live a life of quality. Anderson has the expertise, resources and technology to enable the agency to optimize the quality of life for all people with autism, around the world.

What it reported doing in 2024

The second largest program is children's education program funded by the New York state education department for children with autism and other developmental disabilities. The children in this program are between the ages of 5 - 21. The children are enrolled and referred to the program by the chairperson of the special education associated with their local family school district and county. Aca students exhibit a wide range of functional levels, skills and abilities, often with moderate to severe learning, communicative and behavioral disorders.the education program incorporates teaching and learning methodologies that are based in a positive behavioral supports model, utilizing proactive and support strategies to assist students as they learn and grow. (continued on schedule o)in addition, behavioral analytic teaching strategies, interventions and evaluative data review are embedded into the school's infrastructure. Direct instruction, discrete trial teaching, visual and environmental supports, sensory supports and communication supports are utilized as appropriate. The continuum of services varies among classrooms as the focus of classroom instruction is aligned with the age and ability levels of students. The program for students in elementary age classrooms addresses school readiness behaviors (sitting, listening to a speaker, taking turns, etc), academic functioning and social skills development. Middle school age classroom programs focus on academic and functional academic development, social skills and vocational learning opportunities. Programs for students 16 and over focus on functional academic and/or life skills development as well as the inclusion of transition/vocational learning and training opportunities. All classrooms strive to provide a communication rich learning environment where communicative supports are readily available to all students. Working within a collaborative interdisciplinary model, behavior specialist/analysts, speech and occupational therapists provide consultative and direct services within the classroom environment. Certified special educators then embed appropriate student specific supports into ongoing classroom, lessons and activities.individualized goals and objectives are identified for each student and target pivotal skill areas such as communication, social interaction, organization and independent life skills. Special educators plan content based lessons using a curriculum that reflects ny state learning standards. Student progress and learning is shared with families in a variety of ways including quarterly individualized education program reports, quarterly report cards, meetings, phone conversations with case managers or teachers and email correspondence.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.7%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 87.4%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 86.7% of revenue deployed · 87.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $42.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $702K · 25 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.5M reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.