Ancient Free & Accepted Masons of Texas Johnson City 561

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237500777
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Johnson City, TX, USA
Phone
2103939001
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$29,521
Expenses
$21,944
Assets
$863,120
Liabilities
$3,000

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Blake Fasel (Worshipful Master / President)
  • William I Fisher (Senior Warden or 1st Vice President)
  • William Evers (Junior Warden 2nd Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Blake Fasel (Worshipful Master / President)
  • William I Fisher (Senior Warden or 1st Vice President)
  • William Evers (Junior Warden 2nd Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Primarily Charitable in nature by providing funds and volunteer time and services to the community, schools, and those in need.

What it reported doing in 2024

Members and immediate families of members contribuations made on behalf of themselves and as a Masonic Charity benefiting the immediate community and neighbors to improve the commuity, state and nation not previously claimed as any other deduction or expense valued at a total of $ for the hours valued at $33.49 each.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, 21% for grants, and 5% for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.2%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.7%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 39.33; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 42 of 42 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 42 of 42 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.