Anatolijus Senderovas Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843600557
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- East Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7324076167
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Music
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,709
- Expenses
- $2,230
- Assets
- $23,625
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANETTA BRANDT (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JANETTA BRANDT (PRESIDENT)
- IRINA IRGON (TREASURER)
- KAMILE RUPEIKAITE (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Anatolijus senderovas foundaiton is a non-for-profit organization dedicated to presenting to the public a wide variety of musical programs intended to foster music appreciation in the community and beyond, to advancing public interest in and understanding for musical arts. Anatolijus senderovas foundaiton believes in the power of musical expression as a means to record, preserve and communicate ideas to the public and to future generations. The organization is commited to bringing musical arts to underserved, low-income and underprivilaged people.
What it reported doing in 2023
A collaboration campaign between young performance artists and established musicians providing mentoring, sponsorship, and assistance. The organizations goal is to help those involved in music in their time of need. To create a positive environment for the arts through expanded access to music program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 11.5%; rating input score 11
- Program expense ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 81
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 85.8%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.59; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -90.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -16% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 36.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 11.5% of revenue deployed · 80.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.